Graham v. Flynn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court may not simply \fill in the blanks\ when the State has failed to produce evidence on an essential element
• noting “ ‘circumstantial evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction if that evidence would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt’ ”
• noting “ ‘[C]ircumstantial evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction if that evidence would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ”
• stating No. 21AP-657 7 “ ‘circumstantial evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction if that evidence would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt’ ”
• “Where a jury is cautioned and a correction is given to the jury, the effect of improper evidence may be cured”
• “Where a jury is cautioned and a correction is given to the jury, the effect of improper evidence may be cured”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).