Graham v. DuPont

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “age differences of ten or more years have generally been held to be sufficiently substantial” to establish a prima facie claim of age discrimination (quoting Grosjean v. First Energy Corp., 349 F.3d 332, 336 (6th Cir. 2003))
• applying McDonnell Douglas standard to age discrimination claim brought under the WVHRA
• explaining the McDonnell Douglas framework and this Court’s precedent adopting that framework
• stating “substantially younger” “generally” means“[a]ge differences of ten or more years”
• reversing and remanding upon rehearing after original affirm
• reversing and remanding upon rehearing after original affirm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).