Graham v. Development Specialists, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• normal practice permitting amendment of pleadings as matter of right has no application to class action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• El Chico Restaurants, Inc. v. Transportation Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-11-20· cited 10×
• Waller ex rel. Seabrook Island Development v. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-22· cited 8×
• Torok v. Yost
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-12-05· cited 2×
• Fuller v. Cobb County
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-08-20· cited 1×
• Waller v. SEABROOK ISL. PROP. OWN. ASSOC.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-22

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Continental Investment Corp. v. Cherry
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1971-10-13· cited 35×
• Tucker v. Chung Studio of Karate, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-07-13· cited 23×
• Diversified Holding Corp. v. Clayton McLendon, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1969-09-19· cited 15×
• Bloodworth v. Bloodworth
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-01-31· cited 8×
• Murphy v. Hope
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1972-12-04· cited 6×