Graham v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that county ordinance prohibiting persons from owning “dangerous and vicious animals” is valid exercise of police power and does not amount to a taking of private property
• holding that county ordinance prohibiting persons from owning \dangerous and vicious animals\ is valid exercise of police power and does not amount to a taking of private property
• ban on dangerous animals and denial of permit did not violate procedural due process and did not deprive owner of property interest in lion
• owner forced to give up pet lion
• owner forced to give up pet lion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).