Graham v. Consolidated Naval Stores Co.

Citations

• 57 Fla. 418

Syllabus

<p>1. Where the mortgage given to secure advances to be made to operators to enable them to produce naval stores apparently covers present leasehold lands and the crops to be thereafter produced thereon, and there is immediate necessity for the preservation of the property, a receivership may be proper, even though upon full bearing a different construction be possible.</p> <p>2. A restraining order will not be reversed because it embraces naval stores not covered by the mortgage, the subject matter of the suit, but in fact embraced in a similar suit before the same chancellor then pending in another county between the same parties.</p>