· 2/24/2004
Graham, Gilbert M. v. Ashcroft, John
Citations
- 358 F.3d 931
- 360 U.S. App. D.C. 124
- 20 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1843
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390
- 2004 WL 330010
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- In Fausto, the “Court reasoned that in not granting review to some employees under the CSRA for actions covered by the CSRA, Congress meant to preclude those employees from securing review under other avenues.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Roberts, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.