Gragg v. County Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding interactive voice response system was autodialer even though it lacked “present capacity” to generate numbers sequentially or randomly
• finding that the plaintiff could revoke consent to contact under the TCPA even where a contractual relationship appeared to prohibit such revocation
• finding services agreement silent as to revocation failed to preclude right to revoke in part because it was a commonly used, non-negotiable form and use of an autodialing system was not an essential term of the agreement
• “[T]he matters of interpreting and applying the FCC’s rulings remain within the province of the court.”
• \[T]he matters of interpreting and applying the FCC's rulings remain within the province of the court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).