Grady v. Erhard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that MCR 7.203(A)(1)(a) did not apply where Department of Environmental Quality did not act as a “tribunal” in issuing permits because the Department did not act in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity
• “This Court will not overturn a circuit court’s order on the basis of a harmless error.”
• “Courts review de novo questions of law, including whether an agency’s action complied with a statute.”
• “When the agency’s governing statute does not require the agency to conduct a contested case hearing, the circuit court may not review the evidentiary support underlying the agency’s determination.”
• “Quasi-judicial proceedings include procedural characteristics common to courts, such as a right to a hearing, a right to be represented by counsel, the right to submit exhibits, and the authority to subpoena witnesses and require parties to produce documents.”
• public hearings with no opportunity or right to call witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).