Skip to main content
· 12/6/1960

Grady v. Collins Transportation Co. Inc.

Citations

  • 170 N.E.2d 725
  • 341 Mass. 502
  • 1960 Mass. LEXIS 640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecution allowed to comment on defendant’s failure to call spouse where spouse “is in the control of the [defendant] and available”
  • an inference against a party based on the absence of a possible witness is permissible when the witness is in the control of the party and available
  • “[T]he trial judge may allow the inference to be drawn if the evidence shows the probable availability to the party of the absent witnesses, the circumstances emphatically call for their presence if his testimony is to be believed, and no explanation has been offered of their absence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Spalding, Williams, Whittemore, Cutter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.