Grady Properties Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing possibility of continuity extending contemporaneity required by Rule 803(3) but not finding principle applicable to statement offered to support backward inference [1]
• recognizing possibility of continuity extending contemporaneity required by Rule 803(3) but not finding principle applicable to statement offered to support backward inference1
• finding no error in the district court’s decision to permit defense rebuttal
• severance not warranted where unrelated evidence was only another bank fraud scheme and not of violent activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).