Gracia v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that appellant could not use Rule 59(e) to raise new legal theories
• looking to face of complaint to determine when due process and equal protection claims accrued, and finding such claims time-barred
• statutory requirement that suit be “begun” before July 1, 1990, required “commencement” of the suit pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 3.01

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).