Grace v. Wade & Mains
Citations
- 45 Tex. 522
Syllabus
<p>1. Lien by judgment and levy of execution. — The lien of the' judgment creditor who, without notice, has caused a levy to be made upon land under his judgment, under an execution directed * to another county, is superior to the unrecorded deed of a vendee of tiie defendant in execution.</p> <p>2. Same — Purchaser.—A purchaser under such levy and execution with notice is entitled to the rights of the creditor, and his title under such purchase is not affected by his notice of the adverse claim.</p> <p>3. Same. — At common law the lien acquired by a judgment or levy of an execution extends to and hinds only such title or interest as the debtor hud in the land at the date of the judgment or levy.</p> <p>4. Same. — The rule as to such liens at common law has been modified by our statutes.</p> <p>5. Registration laws — Construction of statutes. — Paschal’s Dig., arts. 4988, 4989, construed. The statute, in plain and unmistakable . language, says that unrecorded conveyances, whether by deed or bond, are void as to two classes of persons, viz : “All creditors” and “subsequent purchasers for valuable consideration without notice.”</p> <p>6. Same. — Paschal’s Dig., arts. 4988, 4989, 4994, discussed.</p> <p>7. Same. — If an unrecorded instrument cannot take effect, but is void as to creditors, it is absurd to say that the creditor’s lion does not hind the land to which it applies, or that it cannot be enforced by sale of the land so bound by it for the payment of the debt, just as . if no such instrument existed.</p> <p>8. SAME. — Nor can the right of the creditor acquired by his lien, not merely to purchase himself, but to have.the land sold iu open market, be taken away by the subsequent record of such instrument; nor can the creditor be precluded from the full benefit of his lieu for the satisfaction of his demand, except by becoming himself- the purchaser.</p> <p>9. Same — Purchaser with notice. — Hence a purchaser with notice, under an execution sale of land upon whic
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McKamey v. ThorpTexas Supreme Court· 1884-05-27· cited 95×
- Taylor v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court· 1877-07-01· cited 79×
- Overstreet v. ManningTexas Supreme Court· 1887-04-19· cited 50×
- Estelle v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals· 1932-12-22· cited 38×
- Bradley v. LoveTexas Supreme Court· 1883-12-07· cited 35×
- Wallace & Co. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court· 1880-12-07· cited 28×
- Lewis v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court· 1887-06-10· cited 28×
- R. A. Brown & Co. v. ChancellorTexas Supreme Court· 1884-04-25· cited 26×
- Keller v. Smalley & HarrisTexas Supreme Court· 1885-03-17· cited 24×
- Traders' Nat. Bank v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals· 1921-03-02· cited 23×
- Catlin v. BennattTexas Supreme Court· 1877-07-01· cited 21×
- Senter & Co. v. LambethTexas Supreme Court· 1888-04-17· cited 17×
- Jensen v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-04-15· cited 14×
- Commonwealth Building & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1933-06-08· cited 13×
- Gibraltar Savings Ass'n v. MartinTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1990-01-31· cited 12×
- Calvert v. RocheTexas Supreme Court· 1883-05-22· cited 12×
- Henderson v. Odessa Building & Finance Co.Texas Commission of Appeals· 1930-02-19· cited 12×
- Wright v. LassiterTexas Supreme Court· 1888-11-02· cited 11×
- Border Nat. Bank v. CouplandFifth Circuit· 1917-03-09· cited 11×
- Sinker, Davis & Co. v. ComparetTexas Supreme Court· 1884-11-25· cited 10×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blankenship v. DouglasTexas Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 68×
- Daniel v. SorrellsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1846-01-15· cited 34×
- Pollard v. CockeSupreme Court of Alabama· 1851-01-15· cited 33×
- De Vendell v. Doe ex dem. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1855-06-15· cited 23×
- Guiteau v. WiselyIllinois Supreme Court· 1868-06-15· cited 20×
- Shepherd v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia· 1853-07-15· cited 19×
- Carter v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1826-05-12· cited 16×
- Price v. ColeTexas Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 14×
- Orme v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court· 1871-07-01· cited 11×
- McFadden v. WorthingtonIllinois Supreme Court· 1867-09-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.