Grace v. Artuz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner's Sandoval claim was not cognizable on habeas review because he did not testify at trial
• “petitioner’s claim as to the impropriety of the Sandoval ruling does not raise a constitutional issue cognizable on habeas review”
• in absence of petitioner taking the stand to testify at trial, “petitioner’s claim as to the impropriety of the Sandoval ruling [did] not raise a constitutional issue cognizable on habeas review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).