Skip to main content
· 11/17/2023

GRACE OTTONE v. WILLIAMSON INVESTMENTS, LLC, D/B/A FLORIDA VILLAS MOBILE HOME PARK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no compelling interest in “leveling the playing field” via election funding statute for Free Speech Clause purposes
  • finding that the intervention of a political action committee that is independent of a specific candidate breaks the “candidate-funding circuit”
  • noting that limits on contributions serve to combat corruption even though limits on independent expenditures do not
  • explaining that “leveling the playing field” is not a legitimate reason for government to place burdens on political speech
  • noting that lower level of scrutiny requiring that challenged law be “closely drawn” to serve a “sufficiently important interest” has been applied to limits on contributions to candidates
  • reaffirming that closely drawn standard for campaign contributions remains valid after Citizens United

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.