Skip to main content
· 10/24/1997

Grabois v. Dura Erect Corp.

Citations

  • 981 F. Supp. 295
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16708
  • 1997 WL 662740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that objectives of a 30-day order, including “bring[ing] a litigation to a speedier resolution,” are “defeated if the 30-day order is interpreted to give parties unlimited time to seek reinstatement of the action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.