Grabner v. Battle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that there was a knowledgeable exercise by the trial judge of his discretionary powers and that he did not abuse his sound discretion in denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial”
• Plaintiff awarded property damage only, even though plaintiff struck her nose on the steering wheel and, because of the nose injury, was “required to undergo a complete nasal reconstruction and a submucous resection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).