Graber v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding coverage did not exist through a careful exegesis of contractual language defining “property damage”
• defining “tangible property” as “property that is capable of being handled, touched or physically possessed,” and holding that a suit alleging lost advertising business, lost revenues, and lost business reputation does not allege loss of tangible property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).