Graber v. Conway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Congress has not created a damages remedy against immigration agents despite legislative attention to immigration matters
• noting Congress had not created a damages remedy against immigration agents despite legislative attention to immigration matters
• declining to imply a Bivens remedy for alleged Fourth Amendment violations by Customs and Border Patrol agents in the course of civil immigration removal proceedings
• finding no Bivens remedy in a context where the Court had previously assumed one to lie
• deferring to prior Fifth Circuit decisions “to the extent that they permit Bivens actions against immigration officers who deploy unconstitutionally excessive force when detaining immigrants on American soil”
• declining to extend Bivens to CBP agents for illegal stops and arrests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).