Gozum v. American International Adjustment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party may ask for a clarification of an arbitration award at a HRS § 658-8 confirmation hearing, despite the party’s failure to bring a timely motion under either HRS §§ 658-9 or 658-10
• clarification requests do not fit within the literal definition of vacating, modifying, or correcting an award and therefore, the ten day time limit of § 658-11 does not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).