Goza v. Welch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statement that the jurors were not required to reach a verdict but should try to do so was not coercive
• acknowledging that subsection (c) \alter[s] interpretation of Rule 5(a)'s direction that an arrested person be taken before a magistrate 'without unnecessary delay.'\
• concluding regarding the District Court’s credibility determination, “We find no error in this.”
• Directing the trial court to make de novo findings on the basis of a cold transcript of evidence presented to another judge, although permitting the trial court to order further live testimony if deemed necessary
• Government would have discovered gun without use of illegally obtained statement by defendant that he had thrown gun out window
• “description of ‘rifles, shotguns, pistols ... ’ should not be read over-literally as placing the machine gun beyond the warranted scope of the search”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).