Skip to main content
· 9/23/1981

GOYINGS EX REL. GOYINGS v. Jack & Ruth Eckerd Found.

Citations

  • 403 So. 2d 1144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “This duty to undertake reasonable care expressed in the first part of the provision would be rendered meaningless if the exculpatory clause absolved appellees from liability.”
  • reasoning that “This duty to undertake reasonable care expressed in the first part of the provision would be rendered meaningless if the exculpatory clause absolved appellees from liability.”
  • explaining that the provision in the agreement purporting to absolve appellees of liability was meaningless when read in conjunction with the provision agreeing to take reasonable care of the minor child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.