Govia v. Century 21, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no basis for application of continuing-violations doctrine but holding that plaintiff “may still seek discovery regarding the alleged incidents that occurred before” timely claims accrued
• “[P]ursuant to provisions of a Work Sharing Agreement in effect between the [NYSDHR] and the EEOC, the cross-filing is deemed to have constructively occurred whenever a New York complainant files with either agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).