Government of United Kingdom of Great Britain v. Boeing Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rule 81 allows application of the Federal Rules “to the extent that [the FAA] 5 does not provide appropriate procedural rules”
• relying on Supreme Court cases holding that enforcement of agreements, rather than promotion of expeditious resolution of claims, is preeminent goal of FAA
• reversing district court consolidation of arbitration proceedings involving separate, distinct agreements between the United Kingdom and two different parties, absent the parties’ agreement
• relying on Supreme Court cases holding that enforcement of agreements, rather than promotion of expeditious resolution of claims, is preeminent goal of FAA
• “Rule 81(a)(3) clearly does not import the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to the private arbitration proceedings that underlie the Title 9 proceedings pending before a court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).