Skip to main content
· 4/10/1981

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Sealey

Citations

  • 18 V.I. 425
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court could not accept defendant’s version of events when there are competing factual accounts
  • relying in part on extra-record sources such as the New York Times and The Guardian in finding no qualified immunity for officer’s use of deadly force where suspect resisted arrest and ran over another officer with his vehicle
  • relying in part on extra-record sources such as the New York Times and The Guardian in finding no qualified immunity for an officer’s use of deadly force where suspect resisted arrest and ran over another officer with his vehicle
  • relying in part on extra-record sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian in finding no qualified immunity for an officer’s use of deadly force where suspect resisted arrest and ran over another officer with his vehicle
  • All facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant and all justifiable inferences must be drawn in his favor.
  • “When we accept the facts as we must, this case is an obvious one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.