Skip to main content
· 1/10/1978

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Paul Testamark

Citations

  • 570 F.2d 1162
  • 15 V.I. 469
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • conceivably negligently destroyed blood sample could have supported incompetent to form intent to rape defense, but defendant’s own description of his actions unwaveringly pointed to competence
  • “[T]he . . . failure to take adequate steps to preserve evidence may deny a defendant due process, and thereby jeopardize otherwise viable convictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Rosenn, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.