Government of the Virgin Islands v. Leonardo Soto, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The gravamen of [§ 2253] appears to have been the possession of unlicensed firearms ... .”
• \The gravamen of [ § 2253] appears to have been the possession of unlicensed firearms . . . .\
• despite legislature’s revisions to robbery statute, court found “no basis to assume legislature modified its prior determination that section 2251(a)(2)(B) [weapon enhancement statute] applied to all robberies”
• “The gravamen of [14 V.I.C. § 2253] appears to have been the possession of unlicensed firearms, since the statute proscribes possession of firearms ‘unless otherwise authorized by law.’ (emphasis added).”
• “The gravamen of [14 V.I.C. § 2253] appears to have been the possession of unlicensed firearms, since the statute proscribes possession of firearms ‘unless otherwise authorized by law.’ (emphasis added).”
• “[T]he gravamen of [2253] appears to have been the possession of unlicensed firearms ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).