Skip to main content
· 1/6/1989

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Forte, Frederick

Citations

  • 865 F.2d 59
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 69
  • 1989 WL 322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \there is no general duty on the part of defense counsel to anticipate changes in the law\
  • counsel's failure to raise Batson claim was ineffective only because defendant asked him to object in light of fact that Batson was pending
  • counsel's failure to raise Batson claim was ineffective only because defendant asked him to object in light of fact that Batson was pending
  • “Only in a rare case” can an attorney’s failure to make an objection which would not succeed under existing law “be considered unreasonable”
  • \[W]e will not read Batson to make a distinction between white and black defendants.\
  • “Batson equal protection analysis was not triggered [on direct appeal] because Forte had failed to preserve his objections and because we did not find plain error in the trial proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Scirica, Weis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.