Skip to main content
· 3/8/1979

Government of the Canal Zone v. Ruben Antonio Yanez P. (Pinto), Government of the Canal Zone v. David Rouse U. (Uweil)

Citations

  • 590 F.2d 1344
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16388
  • 4 Fed. R. Serv. 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deposition statements of assault victims were improperly admitted at trial when the only showing of unavailability was the prosecution’s statement to the court two months before trial
  • El tribunal determinó que no había indisponibilidad del testigo debido a que lo único que alegó el Estado fue que los testigos habían salido de la Zona del Canal.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Tjoflat, Wisdom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.