· 3/8/1979
Government of the Canal Zone v. Ruben Antonio Yanez P. (Pinto), Government of the Canal Zone v. David Rouse U. (Uweil)
Citations
- 590 F.2d 1344
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16388
- 4 Fed. R. Serv. 15
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deposition statements of assault victims were improperly admitted at trial when the only showing of unavailability was the prosecution’s statement to the court two months before trial
- El tribunal determinó que no había indisponibilidad del testigo debido a que lo único que alegó el Estado fue que los testigos habían salido de la Zona del Canal.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Godbold, Tjoflat, Wisdom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.