Skip to main content
· 6/11/1979

Government of the Canal Zone v. Mauricio Burjan v. (Villarreta)

Citations

  • 596 F.2d 690
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14089
  • 4 Fed. R. Serv. 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that amending the information to charge a lesser included offense is a \technical violation of Rule 7(e) but harmless\
  • noting that Federal Rule of Evidence 201, which permits judicial notice only of generally known facts or those that can be readily determined from an indisputably reliable source, applies at every stage of a proceeding
  • “In addition, this court has consistently adhered to the rule that venue as a jurisdictional fact is a proper subject for judicial notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Rubin, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.