Skip to main content
· 9/15/2000

Government Employees Insurance v. Hall

Citations

  • 533 S.E.2d 615
  • 260 Va. 349
  • 2000 Va. LEXIS 116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “ ‘a course of dealing by contracting parties, considered in light of all the circumstances, may evince mutual intent to modify the terms in their contract’” (quoting Stanley’s Cafeteria, 226 Va. at 73, 306 S.E.2d at 873)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koontz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.