· 8/25/2004
Government Employees Insurance v. Google, Inc.
Citations
- 330 F. Supp. 2d 700
- 73 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1212
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18415
- 2004 WL 1977700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Google’s sale to advertisers of right to use specific trademarks as “keywords” to trigger their ads constituted “use in commerce”
- finding that Google’s sale to advertisers of right to have specific trademarks trigger their ads was “use in commerce” because it created likelihood of confusion that Google had the trademark holder’s authority to do so
- dis- missing claim where the plaintiff failed “to plead a specific, existing contract or expectancy with a specific party” (quoting Moore v. United Int’l Investigative Servs., Inc.,209 F. Supp. 2d 611, 619-20 (E.D. Va. 2002)
- distinguishing WhenU’s conduct on this basis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brinkema
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.