Skip to main content
· 1/19/1996

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Stafstrom

Citations

  • 668 So. 2d 631
  • 1996 WL 18443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the addition of a new vehicle to an existing policy did not create a \new policy\ for purposes of section 627.727(1) and therefore did not require a new UM selection form
  • new UM rejection not required for third vehicle added to policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.