Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the phrase “controlling or controlled by, or under common control by, or with” is ambiguous
• explaining that \[p]olicies subject to the [Deemer] statute that do not contain express provisions complying with the statute . . . are [nonetheless] deemed to comply\
• explaining that \[p]olicies subject to the [Deemer] statute that do not contain express provisions complying with the statute . . . are [nonetheless] deemed to comply\
• enacting the Deemer Statute, the Legislature \sought to ensure that New Jersey- authorized insurance companies provide to their out-of-state insureds travelling in New Jersey the same protections required of in-state insured vehicles\
• interpreting the deemer statute to apply \to insurers authorized to transact or transacting automobile or motor vehicle insurance business in this State and to carriers controlling or affiliated with the authorized insurer who are authorized to transact some insurance business in New Jersey\
• Delaware resident injured in New Jersey entitled to recover PIP benefits, where insurer transacted business in New Jersey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).