Gouty v. Schnepel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in “a breach of contract action . . . [Florida’s comparative fault statute] is inapplicable.”
• Florida’s set-off statutes unavailable in light of statutory modifications to the doctrine of joint and several liability
• the underlying rationale of Wells is that “the operation of the setoff statutes was premised upon the determination that the defendant was jointly and severally liable for the same damages.”
• the underlying rationale of Wells is that “the operation of the setoff statutes was premised upon the determination that the defendant was jointly and severally liable for the same damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).