Gourdet v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in view of the “failure of the CBA to address” a particular matter, the arbitrator did not ignore the plain language of the CBA in addressing the matter “through interpretation”
• noting that there was no imminence in Parker where “the District of Columbia had declared its intention to prosecute all violators”
• characterizing the BIA's predictive determination as a factual finding over which we lack jurisdiction
• taking judicial notice of federal habeas 25 corpus petition on appeal
• prosecutors’ actions to deal with post- 27 trial initiatives challenging a criminal conviction, even though 8 1 they could be seen as investigative and administrative, were 2 “also integral to the overarching advocacy function”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).