Skip to main content
· 11/9/2011

GOURCHE v. Holder

Citations

  • 663 F.3d 882
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22584
  • 2011 WL 5443657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the 12 USCA11 Case: 20-11419 Date Filed: 08/18/2021 Page: 13 of 15 “relating to” parenthetical in 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(3)(B)(iii
  • finding that the key phrase in section 237(a)(1)(H) of the Act is “provisions of this paragraph,” which refers only to grounds of deportability under section 237(a)(1)
  • finding that the language and structure of section 237(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the Act showed Congress’ intent that the statute’s parenthetical would “provide a convenient shorthand description” of the removal ground
  • noting that “[t]hese descriptive parentheticals are different from other subparagraphs of the aggravated felony definition that use parentheticals explicitly to limit those offenses that may constitute an aggravated felony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Chief Judge, and Tinder and Hamilton, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.