Gould v. Patterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• modification of probation condition was rehabilitative and did not infringe on appellant’s due process rights and did not require notice, hearing, or second trial
• modification of terms of probation to require sex offender treatment “was clearly rehabilitative, so it cannot be construed to constitute the imposition of additional punishment or an impermissible increase in the sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).