Gould & Lamb, LLC v. D'ALUSIO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[g]eneralized statements of concern” are not enough
• upholding trial court’s ruling of no legitimate interest where the employer “spoke in the briefest and most general terms” of a desire to protect vague categories of information
• employer’s broad statements of concern to protect “marketing plans, product plans, business strategies, financial information, forecasts, and the like” insufficient to establish legitimate business interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).