Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that work-product protection “depends upon the existence of a real, rather than speculative, concern that the thought processes of [ ] counsel in relation to pending or anticipated litigation would be exposed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).