Gough v. County of Dutchess

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Ahanchian and affirming denial of request to extend “stringent” briefing schedule
• when considering whether to dismiss a case for failure to state a claim, courts “disregard any conclusory allegations”
• “We consider the entirety of the relevant facts available at the time of the allegedly misleading statement, not simply the words of the statement itself.”(emphasis added)
• conclusive allegations unsupported by material facts may be ignored, but the Plaintiff is entitled to have the Court accept as true the plausible factual allegations he makes
• \[I]t is not a material omission to fail to point out information of which the market is already aware.\ (quoting Baron v. Smith, 380 F.3d 49, 57 (1st Cir. 2004))
• \[t]he PSLRA imposes a heightened pleading standard on complaints alleging securities fraud\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).