Gossett v. Czech

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, when read in conjunction with pertinent regulations such as 38 CFR section 13.71, 38 USC section 5301(a)(1) “does not prohibit direct payments of [veterans’] benefits to a state hospital for ongoing veteran patient care” (emphases added)
• the exemption “protects the veteran recipient of the benefits and affords security for his or her family”
• payment of veterans’ benefits to a state hospital for the costs of care “prevents the somewhat perverse result of taxpayers picking up the bill twice for the care of an incompetent veteran”(quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).