Skip to main content
· 11/7/2001

Gosselink v. American Telephone & Telegraph, Inc.

Citations

  • 272 F.3d 722
  • 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2866
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24045
  • 2001 WL 1388309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the second factor as “the most important” one to consider
  • “In answering . . . whether the administrator's interpretation of the plan was legally correct, a court must consider: (1) whether the administrator has given the plan a uniform construction, (2) whether the interpretation is consistent with a fair reading of the plan, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Parker, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.