Gosselin v. O'Dea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where an attorney said he was “with” a law firm, the court determined that although “with” may be ambiguous, when viewed along with other evidence of “holding out,” it may convey to a reasonable factfinder that the defendant shared equal standing with the other attorneys who make up the “firm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).