Skip to main content
· 8/14/1908

Goss v. Northern Pacific Hospital Ass'n

Citations

  • 50 Wash. 236
  • 96 P. 1078
  • 1908 Wash. LEXIS 702

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Construction—Subsequently Reducing to Writing —Effect. The fact that a contract for the construction of a building was not reduced to writing and signed until after the commencement of the work does not affect the writing as a controlling statement of the terms and conditions agreed upon, and the writing measures the rights of the parties.</p> <p>Same — Building Contracts — Stipulations — Remedy Provided— Exclusiveness. Where a building contract provided for its completion by the principal contractor within a certain date, and that, for any delay or default of any other contractor, additional time should be given for the completion of the building, the provision constitutes the principal contractor’s sole remedy; and he cannot recover damages from the owner resulting by reason of the delay or default of another contractor having the plumbing work.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.