Goss v. Killian Oaks House of Learning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “court’s approval of a settlement or retention of jurisdiction to enforce a 5 settlement is a judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties” (emphasis supplied)
• holding that the “court’s approval of a settlement or retention of jurisdiction to enforce a 5 settlement is a judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties” (emphasis supplied)
• stating that a court is obligated to exclude from billing charges that “are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.”
• stating that a court is obligated to exclude from billing charges that “are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.”
• stating that “a court’s approval of a settlement or retention of jurisdiction to enforce a settlement is a judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties”
• applying the nuisance settlement exception identified in Tyler to deny fees in an FLSA action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).