Skip to main content
· 10/25/1996

Goss v. George Washington University

Citations

  • 942 F. Supp. 659
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16271
  • 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,629
  • 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1551
  • 1996 WL 633288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “mere fact” of age differential between plaintiff and selectee is insufficient to support inference that adverse action was motivated by age
  • “mere fact” of age differential between plaintiff and selectee insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanley S. Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.