· 10/25/1996
Goss v. George Washington University
Citations
- 942 F. Supp. 659
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16271
- 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,629
- 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1551
- 1996 WL 633288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “mere fact” of age differential between plaintiff and selectee is insufficient to support inference that adverse action was motivated by age
- “mere fact” of age differential between plaintiff and selectee insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stanley S. Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.