GoSmile, Inc. v. Dr. Jonathan Levine, DMDPC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the need to protect defendants’ “highly proprietary materials” outweighed the presumption of public access
• concluding that it is appropriate for documents containing trade secrets concerning the costs, development, marketing and distribution of products to remain under seal
• concluding that material concerning, among other things, a party’s costs is a trade secret that should remain under seal
• holding that “material concerning the defendants’ marketing strategies . . .costs and budgeting” contain “highly proprietary material” and therefore may remain under seal
• concluding that “marketing strategies, product development, costs and budgeting” were “highly proprietary material” meeting the standard for sealing
• concluding that it is appropriate for documents containing trade secrets concerning the costs, development, marketing and distribution of products to remain under seal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).