Skip to main content
· 9/20/2006

Gosman v. Luzinski

Citations

  • 937 So. 2d 293
  • 2006 WL 2683117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the time for filing a privilege log was tolled until the court had ruled on the party’s objections that the discovery requests were burdensome
  • holding that until a trial court rules on a party's objection to discovery based on it being overly burdensome and harassing, the party asserting a privilege is not required to file a privilege log

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.