Goslin v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[o]rdinary, everyday objects such as cell phones, laptops, and cameras may take on a different character depending on the context in which they are found”
• the Officers “stepped into the bedroom with Accilien to ask him who the other individuals were and to whom the items in the closet belonged”
• the Officers \stepped into the bedroom with 7 Accilien to ask him who the other individuals were and to whom the items in the closet belonged\
• “Courts have routinely denied motions to suppress the seizure of cell phones, in the context of narcotics conspiracies, based on knowledge that the phones may contain contacts and other evidence of a crime.”
• “Courts have routinely denied motions to suppress the seizure of cell phones, in the context of narcotics conspiracies, based on knowledge that the phones may contain contacts and other evidence of a crime.”
• ʺCourts have routinely denied motions to suppress the seizure of cell phones, in the context of narcotics conspiracies, based on knowledge that the phones may contain contacts and other evidence of a crime.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).