· 12/4/2014
Gosen v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
Citations
- 75 F. Supp. 3d 279
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167962
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- taking judicial notice of facts in disposing of motions for summary judgment in a FOIA case
- “Because these redactions do not appear to implicate any public interest at all, USCIS properly applied Exemption[] . . . 7(C).”
- “Because these redactions do not appear to implicate any public interest at all, USCIS properly applied Exemption[ ] . . . 7(C).”
- database information such as codes and descriptions of documents “is precisely the type[ ] of information contemplated by the exemption”
- upholding the government’s redaction of database names
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.